Journal Register Company newspapers in Connecticut have won 33 awards in the 2011 editorial contest of the Local Media Association, formerly known as the Suburban Newspapers of America.
The New Haven Register was among the top daily newspaper winners with 15 awards, including 2nd place in the country for Best Sports Section and first place in the country for best reporting on local education.
The Litchfield County Times was among the top weekly newspaper winners in the country with 8 awards.
Journal Register Company beat out all other newspaper companies with 102 awards total.
Click here for the full list of awards.
Click here for a slide show of award-winning photos from our Connecticut staff.
The full list of winners from JRC Connecticut:
- 1st place, Best Coverage of Local Education, New Haven Register. Reporting by Abbe Smith.
- 1st place, Best Column Writing, New Haven Register. “Inspirations” column by Ann DeMatteo.
- 1st place, Best Headline, New Haven Register. “Pain in the Gas” by Mheegan Rollins.
- 1st place, Best Sports Photo, New Haven Register. “Yale football” by Arnold Gold.
- 1st place, Best Feature Photo, New Haven Register. “Essex Steam Train” by Peter Casolino.
- 2nd place, Best Sports Section, New Haven Register. Sports Editor Sean Barker and team.
- 2nd place, Best News Photo, New Haven Register. “Hurricane Irene” by William Kaempffer.
- 2nd place, Best Continuing Coverage, New Haven Register. “Interstate 95 project” by Ed Stannard.
- 2nd place, Best Feature Series, New Haven Register. “The Good Fight” by Jim Shelton.
- 3rd place, Best Headline, New Haven Register. “Hello, Good Buys” by Mheegan Rollins.
- 3rd place, Best Photojournalism, New Haven Register. “Hurricane Irene, the Day After,” by Peter Casolino.
- 3rd place, Best Environmental Coverage, New Haven Register. “Zombie Dump” by Ann DeMatteo.
- Honorable Mention, Best News Photo, New Haven Register. “Bike Man in Snow” by Peter Hvizdak.
- Honorable Mention, Best Feature Photo, New Haven Register. “Snow Graphic” by Melanie Stengel.
- Honorable Mention, Best Feature, New Haven Register. “When Politics Seeps into Breast Milk” by Sandi Shelton.
- 1st place, Best Special Section, The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT: Forging Tomorrow’s New England Experience)
- Honorable Mention, Best In-Depth Reporting, The Register Citizen
- 2nd place, Community Service Award, Middletown Press (Shovel Brigade)
- 2nd place, Best Wildcard Product, The Register Citizen (Every Town Has a Green)
- 2nd place, Best Arts and Entertainment Coverage, Middletown Press
- 1st place, Best Entertainment-Lifestyle Section, Litchfield County Times (Passport Magazine)
- 2nd place, Best Entertainment-Lifestyle Section, Litchfield County Times (LCT Magazine)
- 2nd place, Best Special Section, Litchfield County Times
- 2nd place, Best Opinion Column, Litchfield County Times
- 2nd place, Best Local Business Coverage, Litchfield County Times
- 2nd place, Best Sports Photo, Litchfield County Times
- 3rd place, Best Environmental Coverage, Litchfield County Times
- 3rd place, Best Editorial Writing, Litchfield County Times
- 2nd place, Best Sports Section, Housatonic Times
- 2nd place, Best Column Writing, Housatonic Times
- 3rd place, Best News Photo, Housatonic Times
- Honorable Mention, Best Entertainment-Lifestyle Section, Housatonic Times
- 2nd place, Best Editorial Writing, Westport Minuteman
Public forum invites input on changing New Haven Register story comment policy
3 NovA public forum on changing the New Haven Register’s online story comment policy will be held at 6 p.m. tonight (Nov. 3) at the New Haven Public Library, 133 Elm St.
For a few months, a group of staff at the newspaper led by Metro Editor Ed Stannard have been working on the draft of new guidelines for what kind of comments should not be allowed on NHRegister.Com. Last week, Managing Editor Mark Brackenbury announced that the newspaper would be switching to a system in which staff will review comments before they’re posted rather than after the fact.
Mark’s column generated a huge response – 274 comments were made at last check, including a great deal of back-and-forth discussion between readers, Mark and me.
Recurring themes in those comments included:
* Screening comments beforehand (or at all?) is censorship, and the Register already is too heavy-handed in removing comments that have been posted.
* The Register’s editors do or will allow their personal political beliefs to influence what comments they allow or delete.
* The Register is kowtowing to public officials who don’t like to be criticized.
* This is all about how liberal staff at the Register are and it’s all designed to silent conservative voices. There were about 100 variations of this comment: “EVERYONE knows this is being done to justify screening out all messages except those from bleeding-heart anarchist liberals.”
* The site should require “registration” instead, and use that to better screen or improve commenting, while continuing to allow comments to go up without prior screening.
* Anonymity is the problem, and the Register should require registration with verified name, address, phone number – real identity.
* Some have stopped commenting because of the toxic environment and would welcome the new system because they’ll feel safe again to participate in the discussion.
* People need a thicker skin … if you think a comment is offensive, just ignore it.
* The new system is necessary because the site has been taken hostage by a small group of “trolls” that post racist, hateful and offensive comments, dragging the discussion into a back-and-forth about it instead of a real discussion of the issue.
* Race is at the heart of most of the offensive comments on the site, and a great deal of the cries of “censorship” from some readers. Stories about crime in New Haven continually have racist and offensive comments made.
There’s lots to be said and discussed about all of these points. I’m expecting tonight’s discussion to raise additional points. When we made a similar switch in Torrington, we held a public forum and the people who showed up in person to comment took a completely opposite view of those who were commenting about the new policy anonymously on the web.